Monthly Archives: May 2010

May 27, 2010

Hawaiian Fusion, Swiss Alps and French pastries

Last night I ate “Hawaiian Fusion” at a restaurant called Roy’s in Los Angeles with a former client of mine who works at a big bank. Over sushi he asked me if I could help them develop a new strategy for marketing to small business owners.

It was the first time someone had asked me to get back into the same business I sold a few years ago (at Warrillow & Co., we helped big companies market to small business). When I sold the company, I signed a non-compete agreement, which bans me from providing advice on marketing to small businesses. Even if I had wanted to help my banker friend, I couldn’t.

I was surprised at just how repellent the idea of going back to my old business felt. Don’t get me wrong, I loved the years I spent at Warrillow & Co., the people, the clients, the challenge etc. but I have no desire – none – to go back.

Everybody told me that selling my business would be a hard transition, that I’d feel a sense of loss. They warned me I might feel bored or disoriented. Nothing could be further from the truth and I don’t think I’m alone. The business owners I know who sold their company before they were ready to “retire” are among the most engaged, energized and charged up, full-of-life people I know.

After my friend Greg sold his company, he moved his young family to Europe and has mastered ski touring in the Swiss Alps; Dean has taken a year off to learn about French cooking on campuses from Paris to Sydney; Bobby has thrown himself into angel investing and his charity work; David drops his girls off at school every morning before spending his days advising new entrepreneurs he has invested in.

My own experience coupled with that of other business owners I know has sent me off on a bit of a rant lately encouraging whoever will listen to consider selling their business sooner than later. I’ve included a couple of columns below and the essence of my argument is this: the longer you wait, the more your business becomes part of your identity and the harder it will be to separate yourself.  At some point, another zero in your bank account will not make up for lost time, or opportunities.

The people I’ve known who have had the toughest time adjusting to life after the sale of their business are the entrepreneurs who dedicated thirty years or more to their business and don’t feel they have an identity beyond their company.

I don’t want this post to sound sanctimonious; I just want you to know that despite all the noise, there is life after selling your business and you don’t have to wait until you’re ready to “retire” to get out. Here are a couple of the articles I’m referring to:

Are you an on-base hitter or a slugger?

~ published May 11, 2010 The Globe and Mail

The lead off batter is arguably the most important offensive weapon on a baseball team.

The job is to get on base; it doesn’t have to be pretty. A batter could make it to first with a lazy opposite-side hit that just outlasts the reach of the shortstop. He could get walked or bunt his way on base or make a mad dash for first base after the catcher drops the third strike. Success is measured not by number of home runs or even batting average but by “on-base percentage.” If success is achieved four out of every 10 times, the batter is doing extremely well (Ted Williams holds the record for on-base percentage at .4817).  »more

Your brain’s wiring may predetermine your fate

~ published May 12, 2010 The Globe and Mail

The baseball player’s position in the batting line up is largely determined by their physical attributes. The strongest player bats in the clean-up spot while the fastest, must cunning hitter leads off with hopes of somehow getting on base.

On-base hitters enjoy smaller, more frequent successes (getting on base) while “sluggers” go through long droughts punctuated by rare but large successes (home runs). Similarly entrepreneurs need to decide if they would prefer lots of little “wins” or one big one, which I wrote about in an earlier column. »more

Take the test: What kind of business owner are you?

~ published May 13, 2010 The Globe and Mail

Most growth-oriented entrepreneurs are wired for starting a business, not running one. I called them “on-base hitters” in a previous column because unlike “sluggers” in baseball, they focus on getting lots of little wins in the form of starting many small businesses instead of rare but fantastic successes.

Yesterday I described the Kolbe personality test, which allows you to measure yourself on four personality attributes that predict your success and happiness in running a business. People with a high Quick Start score on the Kolbe test thrive in the chaos of a start-up where every day brings new challenges and the need to think peripherally. »more

Twelve reasons to sell before you ‘retire’

~published May 26. 2010 The Globe and Mail

Have you ever noticed that the terms “retirement” and “exit planning” for business owners are often used interchangeably?

Sometimes it seems the only socially acceptable way to exit a privately held business is to hang on until you’re well past your prime, eventually giving the reins to your offspring so you can play golf for a few years before moving into a home and waiting to die. »more

May 17, 2010

Should Junior win the lucky-sperm lottery?

Since I started peddling my new book, I’ve been asked to sit on a number of panels about succession planning. Event organizers tend to want all of the options for exiting a business represented, and I’m usually the token panelist who has sold a company to a third party. The rest of the panel is usually composed of people who make a living helping business owners transition their company to the next generation of family members.

I find myself sitting on my hands a lot in these meetings.

I bite my tongue every time someone suggests transitioning a business to a family member. Personally, I believe family businesses are wrought with problems. Nevertheless, I usually try to say something objective or at least neutral about family businesses, but with you, I don’t need to mince words. So here are my top 7 reasons not to transition your business to your kids:

1. What if your son or daughter is smarter than you?

If you have smart, ambitious kids, they will be inclined to want to live up to your success. The late Ted Rogers, who has been called “Canada’s Steve Jobs,” became a billionaire by being a maniacal worker and tyrannical boss. In his final years, he admitted that his legendary drive came from wanting to live up to his late father’s success.

If your kids are as talented as you think they are, wouldn’t you want to give them the satisfaction of applying their talents to a business they started on their own? The one thing your business can’t give your kids, and the one thing you can’t buy them as a parent, is the self-esteem that comes from knowing they are succeeding on their own.

2. What if your son or daughter is dumber than you?

If your child lacks your smarts, intuition, acumen, etc., he or she will forever toil in your long shadow. Would you want your kids to feel inferior for the rest of their lives?

3. What if your kids are lazier than you?

Most second- and third-generation family members feel entitled to the fruits of the family business. Do you want to raise spoiled kids and grandkids?

4. Your kids may not want to run your business.

No matter how successful and profitable your business, your kids may not want it. Allen Taylor sat beside me on a panel discussion hosted by Houser, Henry & Syron last week. Taylor’s dad, Lawrence, started Taylor Pipe in 1964. When Lawrence got sick, he asked Allen to join the family business. Allen had had no intention of joining the business and, in fact, was on his way to a law degree when his father asked for his help. Allen joined his father’s business out of a sense of obligation rather than an interest in pipe fittings.

Would you want your kids to resent you for guilting them into the business down the road?

5. What if you pass on a jalopy?

Parents often see their kids as the natural successors for their business in part because they don’t know what else to do with the company. Despite being profitable, the company may not be sellable, and its managers may lack the experience or finances to buy the business, so parents invite their kids to buy the company over time for a share in future profits. If nobody else would buy your business, why would you want to lock your kids into the same handcuffs you’ve worn?

6. What if you alienate your employees?

As soon as you invite your newly minted MBA son or daughter to work in the business, your professional managers will dust off their résumés, realizing that Junior has won the lucky-sperm lottery and is about to leapfrog them on the company ladder. Would you want to alienate the very people who have dedicated their professional lives to helping you succeed?

7. What if you upset your other kids?

A family feud erupted when Lawrence Taylor’s lawyer revealed, in the reading of his will , that Lawrence wanted Allen, and not his siblings, to run the family business. Would you want to irrevocably change your relationship with the children who are not invited to replace you?

You have better options:

You can sell your business to a strategic buyer, corporate refugee, company manager or private equity group or maybe even go public. Buy lunch for an M&A professional or a business broker and ask for his or her advice.

If you’re desperate to give your kids a helping hand in life, sell your business and give them some of the proceeds.

There’s an old saying that as parents, “there are two things we should give our children—one is roots, and the other is wings” (thanks, Emma). I don’t think you should snap your kids’ wings by letting them take over your business.

What do you think?

Below you’ll find some new articles I wrote last week on selling a business.

This Lamb could sell his company

~ published May 4, 2010 The Globe and Mail

I was giving a speech in Calgary recently and got completely stumped by a question from the audience.

I was explaining how every industry has an example of a business that scaled beyond the owner by focusing on something that is teachable to employees, valuable to customers and repeatable enough to create a recurring stream of revenue.

I shared examples from the automotive sector and professional services when a woman in the back row raised her hand and called out, “I’m a real estate agent — is there anything I can do to make my business more sellable?” »more

GM, Chrysler: How not to build a valuable company

~ published May 5, 2010 The Globe and Mail

Selling cars is a tough way to make a living.

Volkswagen — arguably the most successful car company in the world — has a market capitalization of around 29 per cent of revenue.

I bet you’d like to get a little more than 29 per cent of revenue for your business when you’re ready to sell. Yet Volkswagen, the proud owner of brands such as Audi and Bentley, is not even getting one times revenue for its business. Not even close. As taxpayers, our collective investment in GM would fetch an even lower multiple, no doubt. Cars make for a horrible business, but they offer cautionary lessons for anyone thinking of building a company they’d like to sell one day. »more

Do your salespeople consistently disappoint?

~ published May 6, 2010 The Globe and Mail

Have you ever had trouble finding good salespeople for your business?

In my market research company, I used to churn through salespeople. I could never understand why they struggled so much. They did a good enough job arranging meetings but they would freeze when they met customers, asking only a rote set of novice questions or wasting time discussing sports.

Inevitably, they would come back to the office missing a critical piece of information needed to write a proposal. »more

The Importance Of Making A Product

~ published May 13, 2010 Forbes.com

I was sipping a tall Americano at the Starbucks on University Avenue in Palo Alto, Calif., when I overheard the conversation beside me:

“Our business is worth four times.”

“Four? I think we’re worth more like five or six times.”

I assumed they were using the typical valuation formula employed by most buyers: a multiple of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA, to finance types).  »more

Squeezing the Best Valuation Out of a Buyer

~ published May 14, 2010 Inc.com

I recently had coffee with a business owner who has built a successful advertising agency. He has grown his business each of the last three years to the point where this year he expects to generate $1,000,000 in pre-tax profit on $6,000,000 in revenue.

Such success can often come from a kind of single-mindedness. Indeed, the server hadn’t even taken our coffee order before the business owner got down to the reason for our meeting:

“What do you think my business is worth?”

His eagerness was understandable, but valuation is a complex game. I pushed him to tell me what he thought his company could garner. He had heard that marketing services businesses were going for between “four and five times,” by which he meant four to five times earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). »more

I am happy to announce that Built To Sell is now available for your Kindle via Amazon.

May 07, 2010

The danger of accepting other people’s money

I’m writing to you from The Association Of Corporate Growth (ACG) annual conference in Miami Beach where I was invited to be a panelist on Bo Burlingham’s roundtable about the pros and cons of accepting outside investment in your company.

Along with Bo, who is Editor-at-large for Inc. Magazine, my fellow panelists included Martin Babinec, founder of Trinet, which helps fast growth companies manage their HR issues and pay their employees.  Martin has raised a total of $100 million in outside capital through six investment rounds. JW Ray co-founded learn.com, which is a $40 million dollar software business that allows companies to offer their employees training via their computer at work. Learn.com accepted investment money from friends and family to get started and then took a private equity investment in 2005, which they lived to regret.

The audience was made up of private equity investors and venture capitalists who have a strange job: they need to bat away hundreds of companies that are desperate for money while trying to convince the one business that doesn’t really need their money to let them invest.

My job on the panel was to provide the perspective of a business owner who chose to grow a business more slowly without accepting outside investment.

Early on, Martin allowed a publicly held company to buy half of Trinet in exchange for a $4 million dollar investment. The chairman of the corporation joined the Trinet board and would only agree to sell his shares in return for a valuation typical of a public company (i.e. double digit multiple of earnings). Martin found a venture capitalist to pay the rich premium his strategic investor was asking for, only to go from the frying pan to the fryer. His new investor started pushing Martin to go public from their first board meeting.

At Learn.com, JW and his partner accepted a private equity investment in order to fund a growth-oriented budget they had prepared. At their first board meeting after the deal closed, their new private equity investor refused to approve the pre-agreed budget explaining they invested in “cash cows not pigs”.

Soon after, the private equity partner made a second investment in one of Learn.com’s competitors leaving them with a board member who was part investor, part spy for the competition. JW and his partner spent the next five years trying to get the investor off their board.

What struck me in listening to Martin and JW was how much their day-to-day experience of company-building changed once they accepted outside capital. They went from focusing on customers, products and employees to preparing for (and recovering from) quarterly board meetings, disputing budgets and obsessing over deal covenants.

It almost sounded like they had traded their business for a job.

To me, entrepreneurship is about creating something from scratch while bush whacking through the forest of problems and decisions on your own. It is a capitalist escapade of sorts and like any adventure, best enjoyed when you have the freedom to roam.

Contrary to popular rhetoric of the moneymen I met today, I’m happy I kept 100% of a smaller pie that I controlled rather than a potentially more valuable stake in a company I didn’t.

How about you? Would you rather own a small chunk of a big company or a big chunk of a small company?

Here are some new articles on building a company you could sell:

Time to Reset Your Business?

~ published May 4, 2010 The Wall Street Journal

I recently heard about a dentist offering Botox injections as a way to jumpstart his recession-weary dental practice. Last weekend, I jogged past a tanning salon offering teeth whitening. Dentists offering to tighten your smile and tanning salons offering to whiten it? What’s going on here? Increasingly, business owners are starting new product and service lines in a desperate attempt to pick up much-needed revenue.  » more

Is your Service Business Too Squishy?

~ published May 4, 2010 Inc.

David Ogilvy, the famous advertising pioneer, described the biggest problem with a service business in a memorable way. “The assets go up and down the elevator every night,” he said.

Because people are the main asset of most service companies, these businesses are vulnerable to human frailties: At times we all get sick, tired, cranky, fickle, and jealous. This makes the management and operation of a service business somewhat unpredictable—which makes selling it all the more complicated.

When you go to sell your business, a buyer will be looking for predictability, which is why service businesses can be tough to value.

To create a service business you can sell, do whatever you can to make your business look like it has a product and a formula that predictably delivers results.  For example, Peter Turpel went from consulting with companies about how they used their phone systems to developing the “Phone on Hold Marketing System,” which offers businesses various options for handling customer calls (e.g., music, call routing). Turpel moved from consulting personally with customers to creating products around his knowledge so that the business appeared more tangible. » more

The risks of selling companies to employees

~ published April 27, 2010 The Globe and Mail

One of the best parts of writing this column and my books is hearing from you, the reader. So this week, I’d like to turn the column over to your questions. Please use the comments area below to ask about building a company you could sell or to provide a comment you’d like me to address.

Q: “What are the risks involved in selling my business to my employees?”

A: When selling a company to employees, most business owners end up guaranteeing some of the loan the employees use to buy the shares. Your biggest risk is that your employees will not manage the business well on their own and your old business will end up in financial trouble. If the business defaults on its commitments with you as a guarantor of the loan, you could end up owning the business you thought you had sold. » more

When to say you’re selling

~ published April 28, 2010 The Globe and Mail

Q: “How and when do I tell my employees that I’m considering selling my business?”

A: I would recommend drawing a distinction between telling your management team and telling the rest of your employees.

In order to minimize an earn-out, you need to present a potential acquirer with a management team (not just you). That way, the acquirer can get comfortable with the team of managers who will be running the business after you leave. Before you start meeting seriously with buyers, you should tell your managers. To get them excited, you can offer them a “success bonus” tied to closing a deal, paid in two installments: one on the day the deal closes and a second tranche on a future date, provided they are still employed by your company and its new owners.  » more

Help! My company is a cash hog

~ published April 29, 2010 The Globe and Mail

Q: “You talk about charging up front as a key part of creating a valuable and sellable business. I sell to retailers, and charging up front would be a non-starter. My customers are insistent on 30-day terms at a minimum. What would you advise?”

A: Creating a positive cash-flow cycle is an important part of growing a valuable business because (a) it gives you the working capital to grow without having to dilute yourself with outside investors and (b) it bumps up the multiple you’ll get for your company because the acquirer will have to invest less cash to run your business. It’s also a lot more fun to run a business that has money in the bank.  » more